Before you ship
Watch the release-check flow
See how a proposed AI change is checked against calibrated cases before it moves into release review.
Validation
Quality gate before optimization


0.0%
Safety maintained
0
Edge cases
0
Evaluators
0%
Optimization
Internal Case Study: Mental Health Conversational AI
Main challenge: Reduce cost only after safety and quality had a measurable gate
Results
- Pre-release evaluator suite
- 400 edge cases before accepting changes
- Safety tracked separately from cost
- Optimization accepted only after quality checks passed
Get the case study PDF: how Argmin AI built the evaluator before optimizing
To prevent overuse of the document, we kindly ask you to submit your email — we will send you a one-time download link.
We process your email to provide access and start the whitepaper delivery flow. You can read our Privacy Policy.
Process
How it works
A calibration flow for teams that do not have a clean golden dataset yet.
Bring task, docs, traces, and hypotheses
Start with the AI task, domain docs, selected traces, and a few hypotheses about what good looks like. No golden dataset is required upfront.


Argmin AI picks cases and analyzes evaluator mistakes
The platform finds normal, edge, and high-risk examples and surfaces where the evaluator disagrees with experts, so review time is spent on cases that actually move agreement.
Experts review, confirm or correct calls
Experts review and correct evaluator calls Argmin AI drafts first — never from a blank page.


Corrections improve the evaluator and become the eval set
Every correction sharpens the evaluator and updates the calibrated eval set, quality rubric, score anchors, and calibration history.
Test every AI change
Use the evaluator on prompt edits, model switches, RAG updates, routing changes, and agent releases.

Key benefits & features
Release Bar
Turn product standards into checks that run before prompt, model, retrieval, or agent changes ship.
Core Cases
Keep the small set of cases that would change a release decision if they regressed.
Accepted Standard
Experts shape the rubric and corrections, so the evaluator reflects the standard your team actually trusts.
Decision History
Keep a record of what changed, what failed, what passed, and why the evaluator was trusted.
Prompt edits / Model switches / RAG updates / Agent releases