Argmin AI + Agent Quality Builder

Know when your AI workflow is ready to ship. No ML team needed.

Describe the workflow. Add docs, rules, and a few examples. Argmin builds a business-specific eval you can run before each release.

Private by default · First eval included · No card

See how a workflow becomes a reusable product-quality check.

What you get

Evaluator · calibrated

An evaluation system, calibrated

Rubrics, edge cases, and judges tuned to your domain and aligned with your experts. Ready to run on every model, prompt, or agent change so you see what improved and what broke.

Dataset · aligned

A golden test dataset

A trusted, labeled set built for you during calibration, so you don't spend weeks or months building one yourself. Enough to test the AI agent you are building.

A judge measured against your experts

Argmin AI Pareto cost reduction chartArgmin AI Pareto cost reduction chart

0.0%

Safety maintained

0

Edge cases

0

Evaluators

0%

Optimization

Internal Case Study: Mental Health Conversational AI

Main challenge: Build a judge experts trust before changing models or prompts

Results

  • Scored to match expert review, case by case
  • 9-judge evaluator suite over 400 edge cases
  • Disagreements routed to experts, then reused
  • Clinical safety held at 97.6% through changes

What this proves

A generic judge can say whether an answer looks reasonable. Argmin AI answers a harder question: does this answer meet your product's standard, on your cases, judged the way your experts would judge it?

Key benefits & features

Start from the product, not ML setup

Start from the product, not ML setup

Bring the agent workflow, docs, policies, and example outputs. Argmin turns them into checks your team can understand.

Business-specific by default

Business-specific by default

The eval scores what matters in your product: correct answer, right tool use, grounded evidence, tone, format, and policy fit.

Readable verdicts

Readable verdicts

Every result says what passed, what failed, and why. Product owners can review the verdict without reading eval code.

Run it before each release

Run it before each release

Use the same eval when you change a prompt, model, RAG source, tool call, or workflow step.

Product inputs / Business rules / Readable verdicts / Release checks

Watch the agent eval get built

See how a product workflow, docs, and examples become a reusable quality check for AI agent changes.

Demo · calibration flow7 min to your first evaluator

Product-quality checks for AI workflows, built from your examples.

From workflow notes to agent-quality checks

01

Business rules

Criteria, examples, policies, and failure modes written in product language.

02

Workflow cases

Normal paths, edge cases, risky cases, and known failures your agent should handle.

03

Reusable eval

A runnable check that scores the answer, tool use, evidence, and outcome.

04

Review loop

Cases that disagree or sit near a business boundary go to product review.

05

Release check

Run the eval before prompt, model, RAG, tool, or workflow changes ship.

Your AI feature looked great in the demo. Then a customer hit an edge case and the answer was just wrong, and you found out from them, not from your own tests.

Before a product eval

  • A few outputs get skimmed by hand
  • Business rules live in docs and memory
  • Customers discover the edge cases
Quality over time → stable

With Agent Quality Builder

  • Your workflow becomes a reusable eval
  • Failures are scored against your rules
  • Each verdict explains what broke
Quality over time → improving

Business rules · Workflow checks · No ML team

Your data stays privatePrivate by default

Used only to build and run your evaluator.

We don't train on itNever used to train

Never used to train shared models.

You decide what's sharedYou control sharing

NDA and tighter infra available on request.

1 free run to test1 free test run

No card required. See it work on your data first.

How it works

A calibration flow for teams that do not have a clean golden dataset yet.

Inputs

Bring task, docs, traces, and hypotheses

Start with the AI task, domain docs, selected traces, and a few hypotheses about what good looks like. No golden dataset is required upfront.

TaskDomain docsSelected tracesQuality hypotheses
Bring task, docs, traces, and hypotheses
Argmin AI picks cases and analyzes evaluator mistakes
Cases

Argmin AI picks cases and analyzes evaluator mistakes

The platform finds normal, edge, and high-risk examples and surfaces where the evaluator disagrees with experts, so review time is spent on cases that actually move agreement.

Review

Experts review, confirm or correct calls

Experts review and correct evaluator calls Argmin AI drafts first, never from a blank page.

Experts review, confirm or correct calls
Corrections improve the evaluator and become the eval set
Calibrate

Corrections improve the evaluator and become the eval set

Every correction sharpens the evaluator and updates the calibrated eval set, quality rubric, score anchors, and calibration history.

Run

Test every AI change

Use the evaluator on prompt edits, model switches, RAG updates, routing changes, and agent releases.

Prompt editsModel switchesRAG changesAgent releases
Test every AI change

Turn your AI workflow into a product-quality eval

Bring the workflow, rules, docs, and examples. Argmin builds the eval you can run before every agent change. No ML team required.

Private by default · First eval included · No card

FAQ

Yes. You describe the agent workflow, add docs or policies, and review examples in product language. Argmin handles the eval structure behind the scenes.
A generic judge scores what sounds reasonable. Argmin builds checks around your workflow, business rules, examples, and corrections, then keeps that history for future releases.
No. Start with a task description, docs, and a few examples. Your review decisions become the evaluation set over time.
A reusable eval for your AI workflow: business-specific criteria, cases to run, pass/fail reasons, and a versioned history of what changed.
Yes. You can check final answers, intermediate steps, tool calls, retrieved evidence, and workflow outcomes.
You can create the first eval before committing. After that, usage is credit-based.